Detroit Jews ask: Are targeted Israel boycotts the same as BDS?

Detroit Jews ask: Are targeted Israel boycotts the same as BDS?

Our petition, Demand Detroit’s Walk for Israel include all supporters of Israel, promted Ron Kampeas to published following article in the the Jewish Telegraphic Agency. 

(JTA) — For the second year in a row, the Detroit area’s Walk for Israel has rebuffed the sponsorship of left-wing pro-Israel groups because of their support for boycotting settlements.

At the heart of the dispute is a question of definitions: Is support of a boycott targeting Jewish enterprises beyond Israel’s 1967 borders the same as backing the blanket economic and cultural boycott of Israel called for by the pro-Palestinian Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement?

Andre Douville, the chairman of the coalition organizing the walk, said Partners for Progressive Israel and Americans for Peace Now fit the coalition’s definition of supporting the BDS movement.

“Simply put, our advocacy and policy statement says that any organization that supports any form of BDS would not be accepted as a cosponsor,” Douville told JTA on Friday, two days before the event, which celebrates Israel’s independence. “They want to argue that they only support it for business in the occupied territories.”

The left-wing groups – citing different criteria – say that while they support a boycott of settlement goods, they vigorously reject boycotts of Israel.

“We oppose boycott, divestment and sanctions efforts directed at Israel,” said Ori Nir, APN’s spokesman. “We believe such campaigns are misguided and counterproductive. We therefore encourage fellow Americans to buy goods made in Israel, while discouraging them from buying goods made in what is not Israel, in West Bank settlements.”

Differences over whether actions against BDS should be extended to groups that exclusively target settlements are playing out in Jewish communities across the United States. Some Jewish groups have lobbied to extend anti-BDS legislation — now under consideration in Congress and in state houses — to protect settlements. Others are working to exclude such protections, instead favoring legislation that only rejects BDS when it is applied within the ’67 borders, or the Green Line.

The wrinkle in Detroit’s case is that the Jewish Community Relations Council of Greater Detroit, and the local federation that largely funds it, have not organized Israel independence celebrations since the late 1990s, with the exception of a 60th birthday program in 2008. That created an opening 11 years ago for the establishment of a coalition of organizations spearheaded by Temple Shir Shalom, where Douville is executive director, dubbed Walk for Israel. The walk, which attracts about a thousand participants, starts at the suburban West Bloomfield synagogue.

Ken Knappow, long involved in the Detroit-area Jewish community and a member of left-wing pro-Israel groups, said he noticed two years ago that the walk’s sponsors include right-wing groups like the Zionist Organization of America, the Republican Jewish Coalition and Christian Zionist organizations, along with uncritical pro-Israel groups like the American Israel Public Affairs Committee and StandWithUs.

Saying the coalition was unrepresentative of the Jewish and pro-Israel communities in the area, Knappow asked Partners for a Progressive Israel and Americans for Peace Now if he could sign on as a co-sponsor of the walk on their behalf. That would allow him to present the groups’ materials at the outset of the walk and to maintain a visible presence during the walk.

The national groups gave Knappow the go-ahead, but the 18-person board of Walk for Israel rejected the applications, accusing the organizations of supporting BDS.

Knappow provided statements to the Walk for Israel board from the national groups rejecting BDS, but the board was adamant that the settlements exclusion was out of bounds.

“Embedded in the mission of PPI is inherent support for what we call targeted divestment and sanctions,” Douville said Friday. “We don’t even call it occupied territory, it’s Judea and Samaria,” using the biblical names for the West Bank preferred by those who do not consider the areas occupied under international law.

“The right wing is not great on nuance,” Knappow countered in an interview.

In dueling op-eds in the Detroit Jewish News last summer, unavailable online, Knappow and Douville explained their positions.

Partners for a Progressive Israel, for its part, notes its membership in Zionist umbrella bodies and its roots in Hashomer Hatzair, a storied leftist Zionist movement.

“In terms of the camp of Israel supporters, they are dividing us, they’re not allowing gray areas, it’s entirely not kosher,” said Maya Haber, a Pittsburgh-based member of the national Partners for a Progressive Israel who launched a petition last week urging Walk for Israel to include the group and Americans for Peace Now as sponsors.

“We have called for a targeted boycott of settlements’ goods as a means to help end the occupation,” the petition states. “To be clear, as Zionists we do not support a boycott of Israel proper. Rather we accept Israel’s territorial distinctions, and boycott only those areas in which Israel itself exercises military rule and not extend civic governance to all its residents.”

Read more.

Partners Blogmaster
This post was written by

5 Comments on "Detroit Jews ask: Are targeted Israel boycotts the same as BDS?"

  • Hello to every one, it’s in fact a pleasant for me to go to see this web site,
    it consists of helpful Information.

  • Hi, i think that i noticed you visited my site
    so i got here to go back the desire?.I am attempting to find things to enhance my
    web site!I assume its good enough to make use
    of some of your ideas!!

  • Unquestionably imagine that that you stated. Your favorite
    reason seemed to be on the internet the easiest thing
    to consider of. I say to you, I definitely get annoyed whilst
    people think about concerns that they just don’t recognise about.
    You controlled to hit the nail upon the top as well as defined out
    the entire thing without having side effect , people can take
    a signal. Will probably be again to get more. Thanks

  • This paragraph is really a nice one it helps new web visitors, who are wishing for blogging.

  • It’s a shame you don’t have a donate button! I’d most certainly donate to this
    excellent blog! I guess for now i’ll settle for bookmarking and
    adding your RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward to fresh updates and will share this site
    with my Facebook group. Talk soon!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>